Monday, October 29, 2012

I'm not Pro-Choice - I'm Pro-Freedom



I’m not “Pro-Choice” – I’m “Pro-Freedom”

Note:  This is another one of my serious blogs.  Feel free to read...or not.

I didn’t know her name.  She stood at my bus stop day after day and I didn’t know her name and I didn’t WANT to know her name.  You see, my “bus time” is MY TIME.  I do not, repeat, DO NOT want a “Bus Buddy.”  You know the person, they see you on the bus and can’t wait to sit next to you and tell you about their evening or their weekend or whatever.  It’s not that I’m not friendly, nay, I’m VERY friendly.  Gregarious in fact.  Willing to say hi to a stranger, chat a person up in an elevator.  But “bus time” is MY TIME and I have my routine.  My seat.  My meditation (ie: sleep) and I don’t want to be taken out of that.  You could be the bestest person in the whole wide world but I need my 20-to-30 minutes of bus time.

Still, we said nothing.  She’d read and I’d wait.  The bus would come, we’d get on.  She, obviously, didn’t need or want a “bus buddy” either.  Unsaid rules were set and we got along just fine.

One day, though, it was obvious that I would have to speak to her.  Our bus was running substantially late and there’s only so much staring at your feet that one can do (and I was good at it) until the awkwardness of both of us looking up the street to see no bus coming was finally going to reach its max.

So as she cradled whatever book she was reading, I leaned in and said:  “Good book?”  She looked at me and loudly said:  “Well....not the book I should be reading!”  Okay...I’ll bite.  “And what book is that?”  “How to deal with breast cancer!”  And there it was.  A woman who I didn’t even know her name was telling me that she had breast cancer.  SIGH.  So now we had something to talk about and she soon became my “bus stop buddy” meaning we’d chat at the bus stop but, when the bus arrived, we’d go to our seats and not talk again until 7 a.m. the next morning.  I never did find out her name.

But that’s the thing with me.  I either have a face that says “trust me, tell me you have issues” or I ask the right questions to people to have them tell me their issues.  Like:  “Good book?”  What IS it with me?  Why do people open up to me? 

Don’t get me wrong...this is not a complaint.  Trust me, it’s not.  I LOVE that people open up to me.  As a writer and an observer of people, I like to hear what people have to say about themselves and their lives.  I’ve even got a handful of questions that are great openers to get people to open up.  One of the best is when you meet a couple and ask them:  “How did you meet?”  There’s ALWAYS a story.

And then I do a crazy thing...I listen.  I do what is referred to as “active listening.”  What this means is that you actually LISTEN.  You don’t steer the story to yourself and your life.  You don’t give advice or ask inane questions about something that doesn’t make sense – you listen to what they have to say and you find words in what they said and repeat them back in the form of another question.  So back to the “How did you meet?”  Let’s say their response is:  “Well, when I was stationed up at a Navy base in Alaska – we used to go into town to a bar called The Barnacle and she was working there...”  Maybe my next question would be:  “How long were you in the Navy?”  or  “Did you ever go back to Alaska?”  or “Was The Barnacle a dive?”  Typically most people would say something like:  “I’ve always wanted to go to Alaska.”  You see, that’s wrong.  First, it’s not a question and, second, it’s about YOU, not THEM.

Once the second question is asked, this continues with more active listening.  Ideally in a 20 minute conversation I speak for maybe 2 minutes, they speak for 18.   You don’t learn about someone and their life when it’s reversed.  And you, certainly, don’t make it about YOU – you make it about THEM.

I’ve had these skills for as long as I can remember and I think it’s a combination of these skills that enables people to want to interact with me.  It’s like I have a special “good listening” sense or something.  And I have been doing this for years and you’d be amazed at what people are willing to tell you about their hopes, dreams, fears, fantasies, sex life, secrets, etc.  Obviously there needs to be a level of trust, too.

Barbara was one of those friends.  I had, actually, sworn off any more friends.  Literally, I had said to myself that I was done with being the therapist for everyone I knew.  Though I enjoyed it, it does sap one’s energy to active listen and, damn it, sometimes I need some ME time.  But, as these things go, I couldn’t walk away.

Barbara worked for a company that my company worked with.  We would call them and order up boxes.  Each call would take a few minutes because they’d have to look up the number, see if we had the box already, double check, ask a few questions of when the box is needed, etc.  This leaves “gaps” in the conversation and I’m not one to not fill a gap with inane jabber.  So a typical call would go like this:

“This is Barbara – how can I help you?”
“Hey Barbara, this is Matt Terry.  How’s it goin’?”
“Good.  What can I get for you?”
“Can you send over box 1234 and 1235 on a RUSH basis, please?”
“Hold on, let me check...”
This would then be the pause as she’d punch numbers in the computer and it would do whatever.  In these pauses, I would then say things like: 
“Got any plans for the weekend?”  or  “Are you and the hubby doing anything?”  or  “Seen any movies lately?”
Of course with my “active listening” brain the answer to these questions would then spring MORE questions and I would ask those.

Over the time of about 6 months, and though I had sworn off friends, Barbara and I became good friends.  Now, I had never met her in person.  Didn’t really know what she looked like.  But we chatted and laughed and talked about all sorts of things...and here’s what I learned:

She was in a terrible marriage.
Her husband had stolen all their money and invested it in Amway and lost it all.
She was not happy with him, or her job.
They had not had “relations” for over 2 years.
She was suffering from depression.
She needed to get out.

Now, there’s a common rule that I follow and that is to not give advice unless asked.  Listening is always the best practice.  Giving advice isn’t necessarily the best practice but often times they would ask and if they did I would give it.  My suggestions were to see a REAL therapist, talk to her family, and get out of this marriage as quickly as possible.

She followed through and kicked the thieving bastard to the curb where he belonged.  She was now a single woman on the make who had not been intimate with a man in over 2.5 years now and was ready to enter the dating pool again.  Good for her.

One morning, as she was rushing out of her house, she locked her keys in her car and had to call a lock-smith to help her.  When the knight-in-shining armor came out she felt smitten by this handsome guy helping her out and she tossed out the idea for them to go out on a date.  He took her up on the offer and they soon went out.

With years of pent-up libido and a new-found freedom in grasp, she slept with him.  She was on the pill so she knew she wouldn’t get pregnant and it was only the one time...alas...she got pregnant.

When she told him, he denied everything, accused her of trying to get at his “family fortune” – if one even existed and treated her like a pariah.  He would have nothing to do with her or his baby.  She was stuck.  Finally after years of pain and suffering at thieving husband – she finally experiences another night with a man and gets pregnant.  With her whole life ahead of her – this guy wanted nothing to do with her or the baby and she couldn’t afford to raise the child by herself.  She chose to have an abortion.

We talked at length about her choices.  I did what I did best.  I listened.  This wasn’t an easy choice by her.  This wasn’t “abortion as birth control” and she knew that it would devastate her in a number of ways both physically and mentally.  Her family wasn’t going to be there for her – and, obviously, neither was the “father.”  Once she had made her decision, she had no one else to take her to the clinic, so I volunteered.

The procedure didn’t take long.  Fifteen minutes, tops.  Afterwards we rode silently, to a local Denny’s where we chatted a bit.  It’s been so long and the conversation so meaningless that I don’t remember what we said.  I probably said some platitudes but we might as well have talked about the weather or colored pinwheels.  I do know that I offered to take her home but she said she was “okay” and we went our separate ways.

Over the next few months she took more control of her life.  Quit her job, found a new job, commuted many miles, dated, fell in love, fell out of love, found another love – dated some more.  And then we lost touch and I haven’t heard from her in years.  Don’t know if she’s living or dead...wish I knew.

*****

One of the biggest issues I have when it comes to abortion or gay rights is that many of the people who are making/voting/creating the decisions don’t know anyone who has had an abortion or don’t know anyone who is gay...so they get their “facts” from whatever they’re told or whatever they believe through some archaic concept that doesn’t hold up to the reality of the loving gay couple next door – or the struggling twenty-something still dealing with the guilt of an abortion.

This blog, in my own little way, is to put a face on the reality that is abortion.  I’m not trying to say it’s right or it’s wrong but my goal is to clear away what I think is a common misconception about abortion and that it’s equivalent to going down to Starbucks and buying a double latte.  I will be very clear, I’m not for abortion as a form of birth control – but that is often the image that is given by abortion foes.  Like it’s a walk in the park.  Trust me...it's not.

In 2011 Florida made a rule that all persons on welfare should be drug tested.  The thought was that if you’re being given money by the government, the government shouldn’t pay for your drug habit.  On paper, or as a Facebook meme, this sounds completely and totally logical.  You don’t want druggies on the government’s dime.  An idea that people can soundly get behind because, in a lot of ways, it makes sense.

Here’s what happened.  The state of Florida spent MILLIONS of dollars to find out that 2% of welfare recipients were using drugs.  Millions of dollars to save a couple hundred thousand dollars.  Dollars that could have been spent on drug education.   Schools.  Job incentive programs.  Anything else.  But the residents of Florida were so bent on culling those drug addicts from the state rolls that they spent a huge amount of money to find out only 2% were guilty.  Then the question begs:  Who was the drug company?  Oh, yeah, the drug company had a relationship with the Governor’s wife – or something like that.  So this drive to find waste – wasted millions while politicians got rich.  So was this really about saving a dime or....what?

Again, when people hear about women having abortions, or gay people wanting to get married, often times the perception the people who are against this have some one-dimensional mind set.  ARE there people who use abortion as a form of birth control?  I’m sure there are.  But I bet it’s less than 2%.  Are there sketchy gay people out there?  I’m sure there are.  But I bet it’s less than 2% (and there are far more sketchy straight people out there than 2%).

Like turning up the radio in your car to drown out that annoying noise that the engine is going to fall out – I see people who hold stories like this at arm’s length.  They don’t want to hear the heartbreaking story of the young girl raped.  They don’t want to hear the story of the recently divorced woman sowing her oats and being lied to.  They don’t want to move beyond their 1-dimensional view point to see the layers of gray that might exist.

Lastly...if abortion is so important to some people...I simply ask this:  The woman has the baby.  Then what?

What about the father of said child?  Where are the laws punishing him?  If this woman is forced to carry the baby to term then what of the father?  Chemical castration?  Forced payments to the mother and child?  The fact that the father is never brought into the equation is shocking to me.  It’s as if the woman got pregnant all on her own.

What about the health of the child?  If this child is to be born and be born healthy, what is being done by this government to provide for that child?  Pre-natal vitamins, pre-natal health screenings, doctor’s appointments, birthing process, post-natal care, doctor visits for the child and the mother, etc.  I see a strong (very strong) disconnect between when the child is in the womb and once the child is out.

Now the child is going to school.  What is this government’s role in terms of education?  Both primary and secondary?  If the government wants to take such a strong role while the child is “in the womb” what about when the child is “out of the womb?”  What is being done?

If the child is going to be put up for adoption, what has the government done to streamline this process?  How much easier is it for potential parents to be screened?  How are the costs being kept low?  What rules are in place so the transition is a speedy one?

It is, in my opinion, extremely disingenuous, to force a woman to have a child possibly against her will and then turn your back on her the moment the child is born.  Show me how the above is in place.  Show me how the above is being dealt with.  Show me the legislature to bring to justice and throw in jail these lock-smiths who think they can just get a woman pregnant and walk away.  Oh, that’s right; they can get a woman pregnant and walk away.

As the political discourse was ramping up recently, I would post photos on Facebook with the simple caption of “Yep.”  I soon, though, decided to change it to “Something to think about.”  Why?  Well, it’s easy for someone who disagrees with me to bypass a photograph with the word “Yep” but to bypass something that is asking them to “think” makes me think that they might not want to deny not thinking.  In other words – I don’t think there’s anyone out there who would look at a photo I would post and say:  “I don’t want to think about it.”  That would be sort of snobby...

When I hear factions talk about “pro life” and “pro choice” – I’ve often see the words “pro choice” as kind of the loser in that phrasing.  “Pro life” sounds so affirmative while “pro choice” sounds like you’re all for deciding between Coke and Pepsi.  I hereby say that I’m not “pro choice” – I’m “pro freedom.”  Freedom of choice.  Freedom for a woman to choose what SHE wants to do based on her age, health, job, life, children, husband, doctor, faith.  Freedom for people to love and marry who they want.  If the “pro life” people want to say that they’re “anti freedom” then they certainly have the right to do so.


Thursday, October 18, 2012

Airport Film Reviews




The fog was thick.  Thick as I could remember as we drove to SeaTac airport that night.  You could barely see three feet in front of the car.  Much like driving that old video game “night rider” where all you saw were the reflective rectangles of the roadside posts – going in I knew we were going to be there for a long while.

My step-father had flown back to Minnesota to attend his mom’s funeral and his flight was due back that evening.  I was probably 14 or so – maybe younger – it’s so long ago now that it’s all a blur.

We finally parked and went into SeaTac and found out, not to our surprise, that the flight arrival was delayed.  It was circling or something and would hopefully land soon.  Within an hour, or so, we were told that the flight was going to fly down to Portland and the airline would bus everyone back up to SeaTac.  So for what it’s worth – we had four+ hours to hang out at the airport.  Woo-Hoo!

This was back in the day, though, when you could take the underground tram to all the satellite departure/arrival decks.  This was back in the day where you could watch huge jumbo jets from far-off worlds land and take off.  This was back in the day when you could wait patiently, eyes fixed on the passengers coming up the far off ramp looking for that face, those eyes, that smile.  Now it’s like being stuck in an over-priced mall waiting for your loved ones by an absurd amusement park carousel ride for luggage.

While my mother and I took our time waiting, we met up with a young woman and a baby.  The baby was going to be adopted by someone on the plane and we struck up a fast friendship and chatted for most of the evening.  I eventually fell asleep across two chairs in the main ticket area.  It was not comfortable.

In going through my film collection alphabetically – the next collection (after The Adventures of Ma and Pa Kettle) is the AIRPORT Collection.  This is a collection of four films:  Airport, Airport ’75, Airport ’77 and, finally, last and very least:  The Concorde:  Airport ’79.



     Look at all the white people!

Made in the tradition of Grand Hotel these films are star feasts.  Like a movie star buffet.  Grand Hotel was a film filled with stars.  You see, the studio had all these people under contract and why not shove them all into a film.  You get a fluff plot, have them show up for a day or two, pay ‘em a few bucks and you have an event film.



Airport, based on a popular novel, and nominated for a number of Academy Awards is pure cheese.  It’s just a soap opera in an airport.  Dean Martin is sleeping with a stewardess while he’s MARRIED!  Burt Lancaster is stuck running the airport and dealing with a snow storm and a trapped plane.  George Kennedy – the only actor who appears in all four films – plays Patroni – some guy who does stuff.  And then you have a bunch of actors, young and old flitting about with “issues.”  The only real interesting subplot is when a depressed guy decides to kill himself and everyone on a plane by detonating dynamite he has strapped to himself.  Why he wants to take everyone else out is beyond me.  When he DOES kill himself (in the plane’s bathroom no-less) they’ve got to bring the plane down NOW – but the other plane is trapped on the air strip!  What to do what to do?!  Soap Opera set in Airport.  Next?


Look!  More White People!


Airport ’75 – let’s ratchet up the action a little bit, huh?  This is the film that Airplane ripped off so eloquently.  Helen Reddy plays a singing nun, Gloria Swanson plays herself, Charlton Heston plays God – or something like him, Karen Black plays the STEWARDESS WHO IS FLYING THE PLANE!!  And then a smattering of other actors and actresses at the beginning or end of their careers.  Norman Fell, Linda Blair, Jerry Stiller.

In this one the 747 (they’re all 747’s until the last film – duh) is hit by a small plane killing a navigator, sucking a co-pilot out, and seriously injuring the other pilot.  With a gaping hole in the cockpit of the plane Karen “cross-eyed” Black has to pilot it until they can get a REAL pilot (see Heston) somehow in the plane. 

Karen Black and some white gal

 I remember watching this film as a kid and being really enthralled with it.  This time…meh.  The special effects really don’t hold up and the cheesy dialogue is worse than 7-11 nacho cheese goo.


Yes...still more white people, but there was a black bartender. 

Airport ‘77­ – is a combination of The Poseidon Adventure and Airport – this time a luxury 747 all tricked out like a high class lounge – carrying a bajillion dollars worth of Jimmy Stewart’s art – is  high-jacked in hopes of stealing said bajillion dollars worth of art.  Of course Stewart’s daughter and grandson are on the plane.  Christopher Lee is on the plane looking about 60 – which makes me wonder how old he was when he played Saruman in The Lord of the Rings Trilogy – 110?  Olivia DeHavilland – looking beautiful and the other actress who was in every 1970’s film Brenda Vaccaro.  Now, please note:  Brenda Vaccaro and Karen Black went to the school of “smoke so many cigarettes that your voice is hoarse and sounds like you’ve got stage four throat cancer.”

Also note - I'm giving the filmmakers a hard time for not having many black actors.  Olvia has a black "assistant" who, of course, dies.

Rounding out the talent pool is Jack Lemmon, Emmet Walsh – playing a doctor (usually he plays low-lifes) and Darren McGavin who, at any moment, I thought was going to say:  “FRA-GEE-LAY!”

This film was head and shoulders above ’75 and the first because it actually has good acting.  And the special effects aren’t TERRIBLE.  Still, they’re pretty bad.  But you can’t disregard moments where all these has-beens and use-to-beens and sort-of-up-and-comers get doused with gallons and gallons and GALLONS of water.


White people getting wet.


As I watched it, I couldn’t help Jimmy Stewart wanting to chat with the Navy pilots about his time flying B-52 bombers over Germany during WWII.  I’m sure his stories around the lunch table would put any story about a plane underwater to shame.


Jimmy Stewart doing something he can really do.


Do I even need to point out the white people? 

The Concorde – Airport ’79 – this is the last and the very least of the films.  Maybe Boeing finally wised up and said:  To hell with you sinking our planes and hitting them with planes and blowing up their bathrooms!  Even though every film there’s some moment where someone turns (usually Patroni) to someone else and says:  “These 747s are the best built planes in the world!!  That Boeing really knows how to make planes.”

In ’79 what plot there is involves a reporter with some shady documents flying to Paris on a Concorde.  She’s being tracked by her sketchy boss played by Robert Wagner who wants those papers AT ALL COST.  So he’s willing to kill everyone on board.  Why he just doesn’t have her followed the moment she gets off the play…who knows?!  I guess it’s better if his anti-aircraft missile shoots them out of the sky.


George Kennedy.  The one consistent white character.


In this film Patroni is no longer just a grunt but is now a full fledged pilot along with Alain Delon and David Warner (whom I’ve always liked a lot).  The love interest in this picture is played by the non-throat-cancer Sylvia Krystal whose only claim to fame at this point was being Emmanuel in the Emmanuel Joys of a Woman soft-core series.  She just recently passed away at the age of 60 from cancer.  Cancer sucks.


Mr. Delon and Ms. Krystal - foreign white people.

This film contains no logic whatsoever.  When the Concorde is able to spin and twist and loop-de-loop to get away from rockets and a missile and everyone is freaking out – the plane is somewhat intact – and everyone goes about their business like nothing happened.  Even sleeping peacefully.  What?  I’d be puking my guts up, I’d be demanding to know answers.

After the plane lands in Paris (en route to Russia) almost everyone GETS BACK ON BOARD – even Charo!!  I’d be like:  “Dude, this plane has a death wish.  I’m taking Amtrak.”

And one more very annoying thing about this film.  John Davidson plays a character by the name of “Robert Palmer” and he’s hot for a Russian gymnast (who wouldn’t be?) but whenever they talk she calls him “Robert Palmer” – not Robert, not Bob, not Robbie but ROBERT PALMER.  So every single time she says it (and he says it) – I’ve got:  “MIGHT AS WELL FACE IT – YOU’RE ADDICTED TO LOVE!” running through my head.

A few overall thoughts about these four films.  Flight travel has changed so drastically since 2001 these films end up being a bit of a curiosity.  People put dogs in their purses, men ride with dynamite strapped to them, pilots smoke cigars in the cockpit, etc.

No one who is black has any major role in these films.  Not a pilot, barely a stewardess.  At least Kareem Abdul Jabbar was in Airplane as a pilot.  All the black characters are either maids, assistants or bartenders.  In ’79 Jimmy “Dy-no-Mite!” Walker plays a pot smoking saxophone player who actually has more than 3 lines.  And Cicely Tyson is completely wasted with some subplot about a child who died or something.



FINALLY a black person with an actual role in the film.  Of course he gets stoned in the plane's bathroom.

Lastly, the only film that takes place in an Airport is the first one.

Hoping to God that there’s no Airport ’14 on the horizon. 




Friday, September 21, 2012

Logic? We don't need no stinkin' logic!



You can see it, you can note it, you can sense it pretty much immediately.  The moment where you’ve suddenly disengaged a previously engaged student.  Usually it starts out innocently enough when you blurt out something like:  “Take, for instance, the film Little Miss Sunshine...” and the student equally blurts out:  “I LOOOOOOOOOVE that movie.”  You now have two choices.  Choice A:  continue with the point of how much you can’t stand the movie or choice B: lie and say you love it, too, even though you don’t.  Being honest and wanting to make the point – I continue with Choice A and then watch as the eyes glaze over, the smile fades, arms get crossed and...there you have it...total disengagement.   I hate when that happens.  But, sometimes, to make your point – it HAS to happen.

Here’s the wacky thing about films.  You can either love them...or hate them...or like them.  While someone else can either love them...or hate them...or like them.  I’m reminded years ago of the film War Games where Matthew Broderick gets all up in the Ferris Buellerish world of nuclear war (okay, not really).  My wife and I saw this film at the Seattle International Film Festival as part of the secret fest (it was just coming out the following week – so it really wasn’t much of a secret) and we enjoyed it.

                          Pre Ferris Bueller and about War Stuff

That weekend I watched both “Sneak Previews” and “At the Movies” two similar movie critic shows and it made me laugh because Lyons and Medved (I think) LOVED the movie and all its elements and Ebert and Siskel HATED the movie and all its elements.  Were they watching the same film?

So when I go off on a film in my screenwriting class – a film I might despise for whatever reason – I take the risk of pissing off a student who thinks that film is Citizen Kane just with more annoying characters.  Now, I say to the students, pretty quickly as “Mr. White Guy With A Fro” disengages, that it’s okay to like and dislike films – as long as you have valid arguments to back them up.  Just because I like something doesn’t mean that YOU have to like it and I’m not going to judge you poorly if you say your favorite film is Freddy Got Fingered (okay, maybe if you say that film is your favorite film because that film really REALLY is bad).

                                    Really REALLY Bad

But where does my argument go from there?  At what point does my trashing a beloved R rated well cast, academy award winning film become a learning lesson for my students as opposed to just me bitching about a film that they, obviously, think is WONDERFUL?  It falls into the world of logic.  Reality.  World.

Films, and of course screenplays, by their very nature, are illogical.  You have people in non realistic situations (usually), people who never go to the bathroom, sleep, take naps, scratch themselves or fart (usually), with music that swells around them and over them as if an orchestra is following them around from location to location (usually) and they follow some sort of bizarre Joseph Campbell hero journey structure where they make choices, face fears, struggle, fight, love, make-love, struggle some more, face death, climb up out of the pit of utter despair and kill something or someone or something metaphorical and accomplish their goal...or not (usually).  We, in our day-to-day lives are logical in that we get up, eat food, travel somewhere, work, go to the bathroom, fart, scratch ourselves, earn a paycheck, make choices like “which tomato is fresher” and “paper or plastic” face the fear of unable to find the remote – find it (heavy sigh) and go to sleep (usually).  No facing death.  No huge decisions.  No climbing out of a pit of despair (usually).  Sometimes the biggest decision we face in the course of the day is whether or not you can spare the extra 9 minutes after pushing the snooze button the alarm – AND THAT’S AT 6 A.M.?  The big decision is done and you’re not even fully awake!

Back to logic.

When you’re writing a screenplay whether it is in outer-space, inner-space, old west, modern times, love story, horror, etc. it has to adhere to the world that you, the writer, create.  That world HAS to exist in some way shape or form with the rules and laws of the world it creates.  In other words – you’re asking a reader to go into the world of the Hobbits.  Great, Middle Earth, but Middle Earth has its class systems, its prejudices, its issues.  To suddenly, at some point, have a Hobbit grow six feet tall and announce that he’s not hungry and doesn’t need a pipe would be in direct conflict with the world that you created.  For some this might be no big deal...for others this would be heresy.  And, yes, my brother still complains that there’s no Tom Bobbadill character in the Lord of the Rings.

    Logical world with real rules and stuff and orcs and more stuff
 

Once those rules are in place and in motion – if those lines are blurred – much like Tom – it is up to the viewer to determine if it’s “okay” or “not okay” to continue to buy into the story.  These are what I call “logic leaps.”  How many leaps are you willing to take before you finally say:  ENOUGH!!

Let me remind all you dear readers that I LOVE film.  LOVE IT.  I am fully willing to have a suspension of disbelief.  Whether that’s a fish looking for his son, a robot in love, a woman meeting up with strangers to kill a witch, a man suffering from depression who meets his guardian angel, a boy in outer-space, a space alien who likes Reese’s Pieces, etc.  I’m not Mr. dowdy-howdy here.  I’m all for suspension of disbelief but...and it’s a BIG BUT...there are only so many leaps I’m asked to take and if those leaps completely undercut a character or important part of the story – then even worse.



Back to Little Miss Sunshine.  This is a cute little film and I won’t recap the entire story here but I will note the leaps and you can determine if I’m completely out-of-whack or not.  This is not about the actors (most of whom I love) who do a great job.  Alan Arkin, who went to school with my mom, deservedly won the Oscar for his part.  But back to the leaps.

               Alan Arkin - great actor and classmate of my mom


Leap 1:  Boy refuses to talk.  Why is this a leap?  Well, first, I’ve never ever EVER heard of someone – including a boy refusing to talk.  Is it possible?  Sure...anything is possible.  And in this screwed up family why not.  But asking me to buy into this – when I know full well that this is just a plot device to have him talk eventually makes me a little gun-shy to begin with.  So I’ll give this a leap-factor of 5 (out of 10).

Leap 2:  Family decides to travel en masse to the girl’s pageant.  Okay, I guess I get this.  Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.  Figure someone would stay home and watch the house.  Leap factor 4.

(now forgive me if I get some of these out order – it has been awhile)

Leap 3:  Grandpa dies and they have to smuggle the body out of the hospital.  In this day-and-age?  Sigh.  Leap factor 6.

Leap 4:  While reading a magazine (according to my son and his girlfriend – picked up at the hospital) – there’s an EYE CHART in the magazine and, using the eye chart – the boy realizes he’s color blind and can’t become a pilot like he wants – causing him to freak out and speak!  Yes, this is the forced scene that I was anticipating the moment I was told that the character refused to speak.  Leap factor 10!  This is unforgivable on a number of levels.  First:  How many magazines – even those at the doctor’s office – have eye charts in them?  Second:  Abigail Breslin’s character has large coke-bottle glasses as part of her character.  Didn’t the family EVER take the brother to the eye doctor?  EVER?

                   Notice - she has been to the eye doctor - he has not


Leap 5:  Staying at a local hotel the father finds out his mentor is, surprisingly, staying just a few miles away so he borrows someone’s moped and goes and visits his mentor.  This one didn’t really bother me too much but, still, it’s forced conflict and just, again, is a nail in this script’s logic coffin.  Leap factor 7.

Leap 6:  This is the big one – on par – if not worse than Leap 4.  We learn that the Steve Carrel character is depressed and suicidal because he recently broke up with his boyfriend.  So on this trip through the Southwest, in the middle of nowhere, he runs into his ex-boyfriend at a gas station.  REALLY!!  If I was reading this script I would have tossed it across the room, picked it up, tossed it again.  Then I would have burned it.  Leap factor 100!  HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN?

Again, I’m a forgiving type of person and I could easily over look one or two or maybe even three...but when you give me, at least, 6 logic gaps and a couple of them are so egregious as #’s 4 and 6 – I just can’t live in the world of Little Miss Sunshine again.   And the writers won the Academy Award for this.  Please.

The above are what I call story logic leaps and don’t get me started (or maybe best to left to a future blog) on the logic leaps of The Dark Knight and Inglorious Basterds.  I’m going to talk next of what I call character logic leaps.

                                       Lots of Logic Leaps

                                                    Ditto

Your script is filled with characters.  They need to act like what you’ve created.  If you create some hard-ass military man at some point you don’t want him sobbing in a corner sucking on his thumb (unless it makes logical sense).  Too often films are filled with characters that are set up a certain way but then they do something that is so illogical that it completely undermines that character as they were created.  Are these character logic problems worse than story logic problems?  That’s open for debate.  It depends on how important that particular character is to your story.

Here’s my example:  Paul Thomas Anderson made a film entitled Magnolia about a bunch of lives that intersect in California.   It was a very well made film with many characters all living their lives and going about their business.  This film, like Sunshine was highly praised and a darling with the critics.  But I had a problem with a character.  Okay TWO characters.



Tom Cruise plays a very charismatic misogynistic jerk who is doing all-male seminars about “getting back to being a MAN!”  These are highly popular and it is mentioned in the film that he is making a lot of money doing these seminars, writing books, etc.  Who cares that he’s a huge douche-bag because he’s got the world by the balls and he’s squeezing.  He’s a “tough guy” that takes no guff from anyone.  Did I say he’s really popular and been doing these seminars for a while?  Let me remind you of that.

                                           Douche-bag

In one scene, after a particularly successful seminar, he agrees to do an on-camera interview with a very attractive reporter.  Of course he saunters around like a peacock and he’s all manly manliness etc.  Well, the reporter starts asking him questions and brings up the fact that his mother, I think, died of a suicide when he was young.  Tom Cruise FREAKS OUT!  This guy, who, again, HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR MONTHS – IF NOT YEARS, completely comes unglued.  He’s a smart guy – he MUST have known this would have come out at SOME POINT and he should have a pat answer for it.  And how it hadn’t come out already is a logic leap of vast proportions anyway.  He gets in her face, he threatens her, he internalizes, he goes psychotic – whatever you want to say – he pretty much does it in this scene – ALL WHILE BEING FILMED.  This, of course, is the downfall of his career.  But it makes no logical sense to the character and it completely undermines the character and what we’ve already learned about him.  Once the curtain is pulled away there’s no character there anymore and maybe that’s PTA’s point but I don’t think so.  How would I have written the scene?  She asks him the question.  He loses his smile.  He says a pat answer to her – she challenges – he gives the pat answer again and says:  “Look, this interview is over.”  And walks out.  After that he goes into his trailer/hotel room/bedroom – wherever he’s at and takes it out on the RCA 26” TV or something.  That’s logical.  Having him completely come unglued for something he knew had been coming all along made me immediately knock a star off this film.

The second character – it’s the same sort of thing.  An old, dying of cancer, game show host is being put out to pasture.  He has no family, pretty much, to speak of.  All he has is this job he’s been doing for the past 40 years.  A live game show where kids answer questions and win prizes.  He doesn’t want to be pushed out – he knows the network doesn’t want him – he’s feeling very frustrated.

                            Old and Dying Game Show Host

Another live show starts and the kids are all ready but one kid is being picked on by the others.  Finally little Billy has to pee and pee bad and they come back from commercial and the host, the old guy, WHO’S BEEN DOING THIS LIVE SHOW WITH KIDS FOR 40 YEARS, doesn’t know what to do when the kid pees his pants.  I mean, C’MON!  He should be running into this problem every two weeks!  It’s live TV, it’s KIDS!  He should have gone right into a standby mode – having faced this before – and known what to say and how to say it and switch to another camera, take another commercial break, etc.  But he doesn’t know what to do!  Please.  Do I care about this character anymore?  No.  Because he’s an idiot.  Or how he’s been written, he’s an idiot.

                                         The "Pee" Kid

Finally – I recently watched the film The Campaign and this has what I now call the DVD Logic Leap.  What this simply means is that the filmmakers take a huge/gigantic/what the hell? logic leap for no reason other than, I assume, to flesh out the entire scene on the “unrated DVD” version.  The film is 85 minutes long!  You couldn’t add the three or four minutes to the film to make sure that there isn’t this huge head-scratcher right in the middle of the 2nd Act?  I guess not.

                                 Wait for the DVD Release

To recap...The Campaign is a very silly, don’t take seriously, fluffy, completely absurd film.  But...even if it IS all those – it has to create a real/logical world that makes some sense.  Or you might as well have unicorns come out of the ground and fight mutant butterflies for the rights to the Yoplait yogurt active yeast at the local Safeway.

As this story of two politicians gets more and more heated there’s a scene where, SOMEHOW, one of the candidates got the other candidate’s SON to call him Dad.  We, the audience, have no idea how this came about – because it’s never explained.  It’s just, well, done.  Leaving SUCH a gaping hole in the story that I was wondering what happened.  But it goes to what I call the “unrated DVD” version reason.  I know that this complete scene will show up in THAT version that runs 104 minutes and not 85 minutes.  But who makes these choices?  I hope it’s not the director...who should know better.

More on logic leaps later.  Thank you for listening (reading).

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Frontier Communications Suck



Sigh...

Here’s the deal...you would THINK that a company that deals in communications would be, uh, able to communicate.  Obviously not.

A few months ago we got slammed with a HUGE bill.  For some reason we were suddenly charged double or something for our cable/internet/phone package.

I called them up and they gave me this sort of “shrug” of the shoulders.  “Uh, we don’t know WHAT HAPPENED!!  We’ll check on that.  How about you re-new for your same package as a package rate may have fallen off and we’ll reset you and give you better/more channels and give you a credit.”

Now, understand, we pay about $150 a month for all three and it had bounced to $270.  So the following month it went “down” to $170 and then, to credit our account, we got a bill for $16.  And then back up to $170ish.  Okay.  We’re good to go - all is right in our technological world.

But then, for some reason, in this “reset” – they had changed us to “on-line bill pay only.”  So I panicked when I hadn’t seen the bill and went on-line and changed it back to “mail only.”  I paid it on-line and was done with it.

A month goes by and again, no bill in the mail.  I go back on-line and I see that we’re still “on-line bill pay only.”  I’m like:  WHAT THE HELL?!

Well, you see, there’s this LIIIIIIIITLE box that I was supposed to click and then click on the button that says “continue” – but this button looks like ALL THE OTHER buttons.  It’s not larger, a different color, or anything else to set it apart.  So it’s easy to miss.

                                You know, something like this....

Once again, I paid it on-line and then decided to set up an “automatic pay” so I can just not deal with this crap anymore.  They’re good at sending me an e-mail telling me my bill is ready and how much it is – so I’ve got that, at least.

This month was the first “auto-pay” and I’d already written it down in my check-book as having come out but it’s supposed to come out at the first of the month and I had yet to see an e-mail saying that the payment had been processed.

                                                Or this...

Once again I go online and see that everything is all set and good to go – why hasn’t the payment been made. OOOOOOOOH, yeah, there’s that little “continue” button that’s hiding in plain sight.  I hit the “continue” button and it says:  “Okay, you’re all set for auto bill pay.”

But...wait.  It’s the 4th and it was supposed to come out the 1st.  Is it suddenly going to retroactively remove the payment that should have come out 3 days prior or...am I just setting this up for NEXT month?

I call Frontier and ask them what is going to happen.  Once again I get a bit of a shrug:  “Just to be safe, go ahead and do an one-time payment, and that way it’s covered.  I don’t THINK you’re going to be paying twice.  But go ahead and take off the auto-pay and then, after your payment goes through, put the auto-pay back on.”  Okay, fine.  So I do the on-line payment and figure it’s done, taken care of, good to go.

                                         Or, even, THIS!!

Where’s my confirmation e-mail?  When I order something off of Amazon, or GOG, or ANYPLACE I usually get an e-mail within 10 minutes saying:  “Hey, thanks for the payment.  Know that your order is being processed...blah blah blah....”

No confirmation e-mail.  No nothing.

To circumvent this, I log onto my bank account online and see that no payments have been taken out either on the 1st or on the 4th or...

Once again I call Frontier up and talk to a customer service person.  It even SAYS ON THE WEBSITE that once payment has been processed I’ll get an e-mail.  That’s great, but where the hell is the payment?  The customer service rep says:  “It takes 48 hours for it to process.”  What?  Okay, fine, how about an e-mail then saying:  “Payment received, it will take 48 hours to process?”  “We don’t send out e-mails like that.”  EXCUSE ME?!  Well, he asks me if I got a confirmation number when I did the “on-line” payment.

I can’t remember if I got a confirmation number.  That usually is forwarded to me via e-mail – something Frontier obviously doesn’t care to use or know about.

                       This would have been perfect and clear...


Now I have to wait 48 hours (past the due date of my bill) to find out if, in fact, it went “through” or if I didn’t click a DIFFERENT “continue” box or whatever.  He notes that the “worst that can happen” is that I’ll be charged a $7 late fee for paying the bill late.  My credit rating, he swears, won’t be hurt – but he’ll make a note to waive the late fee because I’ve been trying to pay.

I know – why don’t you just enter the 21st Century and make it clear and simple?  How about that?

Argh.