Young Buster - pre alcohol addiction
The latest films that I watched are “kinda” connected
but...not really. One is a silent film
and the other(s) are sound films starring a silent actor. The actor is Buster Keaton and the collection
is, well, “The Buster Keaton Collection.”
Older - "making ends meet" Buster
In the 1940’s, after sound films had taken over, Keaton’s
career had hit the skids and he had hit the bottle. Divorced, broke, struggling with alcohol
Columbia took him in to make movies.
Well, not feature films but “Columbia’s Selected Shorts!” So what you got were 10 movies averaging
about 20 minutes each starring about the same group of actors. Filmed over 3 or 4 days these films were
quickie little movies probably shown between the “Bugs Bunny Cartoon” and the
“Newsreel” at the local double feature.
Notice "Columbia Short Subject Presentation" - still Buster is over the title...
When Keaton was in his hey-day he directed himself in some
wonderful feature films. To be relegated
to these ensemble pieces with little or no control – it must have been
heartbreaking. But...if you’ve got debts
to pay and kids to feed – you got to do what you got to do.
Are the films any good?
Well, in a word...no. Slapped
together, most of the films don’t have the poignancy or the artistry of what
Keaton created in the 1920’s. Typically
the films would end up with just slapstick gag after slapstick gag: “You fall down here. You go there and fall down. Then everyone falls down.”
But...in a few...the genius still surfaced. There were moments – nods to his film “Cops”
and one film used the same “high angle” as Harold Lloyd’s film “Safety
Last.” But, sadly – as beautiful as some
of the set-ups and gags were, on a whole they weren’t very funny.
Older, sadder Buster...
After the 10 shorts there’s a short documentary about the
films and even these Keaton experts say that they’re not very good and they,
too, point out some moments where you can see the genius but then, as quickly,
it goes back into the mediocre hole when someone falls down. I feel sorry for anyone who purchased the set
of films only to watch the documentary first to hear the people talk down these
Columbia shorts that they just bought.
Diggin' that font...
The second film I watched was the movie “Foolish
Wives.” Directed by, and starring, Erich
Von Stroheim – the title cards talk about how this film was, originally, 23
reels or something and that it has been painstakingly restored. I thought:
“How long IS this?” 2 hours and
23 minutes. Sigh. Do I really want to watch a 2.5 hour long
silent film? You see – with most of my
films I watch at work, I watch while I play on my phone so I never devote 100%
of my time watching the movie – just listening to it. Piano music is great for 2.5 hours but I DO
have to see the title cards and the dialogue cards.
The story? Well Erich
plays a Russian Prince (or something) hanging out with his “cousins” in Monte
Carlo. They’re actually thieves who are
living the highlife by passing off counterfeit bills. By day their the most proper dignitaries one
could imagine. By night they’re trying
their best to score some cold hard cash.
There isn’t a redeeming quality amongst them.
"Cousin"
Erich soon sets his sights on a young (23?) year-old
American woman who is visiting Monte Carlo with her much older husband. They’re rich Americans and Erich sees an easy
score.
Before you can say “rapscallion” – Erich has infiltrated this
couple and has offered to be their tour guide.
She, and others, fall under is monocled trap has he takes her to events,
shows her that he can shoot doves and sweeps her off her feet. Meanwhile his “Cousins” are flirting with
other men.
Flirtin' with the Rich American woman...
Late in the film we find out a couple things... Thing 1.
the counterfeiter they’ve been using lives in the slums and has a sickly
daughter. Thing 2. There’s a maid in the house who has worked
there twenty years who, at some point, was proposed to by Erich. Erich has promised to marry her and she keeps
waiting for him to do good on his promise.
He promises her again, saying that his “Russian paperwork is being held
up.”
Would you trust this guy? Oh, and monocles are badass.
On a fateful night at the Casino Erich encourages Ms.
American to bet her cash at the roulette wheel and she wins. Knowing that she has a bunch of cash, he
entices the woman back to his place.
When she arrives the spurned maid, as best as I can say it, goes a
little nutso.
"Hell hath no fury like...(you know the rest)"
To tell you how it ends would ruin what is actually a pretty
great film. Sadly, there are some gaps
from the missing reels so things do get kind of “herky jerky” in terms of plots
and plotting. Where the film really
shined, though, is in its cinematography.
There are some set-ups that are amazing in terms of lights, lighting,
dust, angles and so-on. Stroheim was
really on his game as a film-maker, even though you really REALLY hated his
character. One scene late in the film when the American woman realizes she has wronged a gentleman is heartbreaking.
Foolish wife? More like foolish American husband to let her wife be seduced by such a evil monocle wearing man...
The title “Foolish Wives” comes from a book the American
woman is reading entitled “Foolish Wives” written by Erich Von Stroheim.
So in one corner you have Keaton at the end of his career
doing slap-dash unfunny “comedy shorts” and on the other hand you have a great
film-maker like Stroheim at the beginning of his career and showing some
amazing skills as both an actor AND film-maker.
TOTALLY badass...